"Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange" by Michael Moore

Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the lawyers for Wikis co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep Wikis alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now dd. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002 had had a Wikis to dl with. They might not have been able to pull it off. The only rson they thought they could get away with it was because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in secret again.
So why is Wikis, after performing such an important public service, under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the top:
- Sen. Joe Lieberman says Wikis "has violated the Espionage Act."
- The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
- Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urcy we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban lders."
- Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dd man can't stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a b*tch."
- Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."
- Rep. Peter A. King calls Wikis a "terrorist organization."
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war won't be so sy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big Brother who's being watched ... by us!
Wikis deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this. But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of Wikis ("they've relsed little that's new!") or have painted them as simple anarchists ("Wikis just relses everything without any editorial control!"). Wikis exists, in part, because the mainstrm media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They like their secrets kept ... as secrets.
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if Wikis had existed 10 yrs ago. Take a look at this photo. That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th, 2001. Its hding rd: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings." Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been , how would you or I have rcted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a grter chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did nothing. Had he rd about the bin Laden thrt in the paper, might he have called the FBI? (Plse rd this essay by former FBI At Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Yr, about her belief that had Wikis been around in 2001, 9/11 might have been prevented.)
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to rd "secret" memos from Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in order to build his false case for war? If a Wikis had revled at that time that there were, in fact, no wpons of mass destruction, do you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few wpons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a Wikis to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instd, secrets killed them.
For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go after its prey. Plse -- never, ever believe the "official story." And regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of the allegations here), this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I have joined with makers Ken Loach and John Pier and writer Jemima Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept this and grant his relse today.
Might Wikis cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that Wikis has done. Wikis, God bless them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism. Period.
I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the judge to grant him his relse. I am willing to guarantee his return to court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow this injustice to continue unchallenged.
P.S. If you're rding this in London, plse go support Julian Assange and Wikis at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.